In one line
Take the stem from the
ilsform of the present, drop-ent, and add-e -es -e -ions -iez -ent.
English has a subjunctive too — it has just gone almost invisible. "I insist that he be present", "if I were you", "God save the Queen", "come what may". Those are all subjunctives, and they do exactly what the French one does: describe something not being asserted as fact. The difference is frequency. English uses it in a handful of frozen phrases; French uses it several times in an ordinary conversation.
The forms on this page
| Form | Means | Sound |
|---|---|---|
que je fasse | that I do — the form that follows emotion, doubt and necessity | /kə ʒə fas/ |
The table
Building it with finir:
| Step | Result |
|---|---|
1. ils /il/ present | ils finissent /il fi.nis/ |
2. drop -ent | finiss- /fi.nis/ |
| 3. add the ending | que je finisse /kə ʒə fi.nis/ |
| Person | Ending | finir | parler | prendre |
|---|---|---|---|---|
que je /kə ʒə/ | -e | finisse /fi.nis/ | parle /paʁl/ | prenne /pʁɛn/ |
que tu /kə ty/ | -es | finisses /fi.nis/ | parles /paʁl/ | prennes /pʁɛn/ |
qu'il /kil/ | -e | finisse /fi.nis/ | parle /paʁl/ | prenne /pʁɛn/ |
que nous /kə nu/ | -ions | finissions /fi.ni.sjɔ̃/ | parlions /paʁ.ljɔ̃/ | prenions /pʁə.njɔ̃/ |
que vous /kə vu/ | -iez | finissiez /fi.ni.sje/ | parliez /paʁ.lje/ | preniez /pʁə.nje/ |
qu'ils /kil/ | -ent | finissent /fi.nis/ | parlent /paʁl/ | prennent /pʁɛn/ |
nousandvousare built from thenousstem of the present, not fromils— which is why it isque nous prenions, not. This is the boot-verb pattern again.prennions
Why these endings look familiar
For -er verbs, four of the six forms are identical to the present indicative:
| Indicative | Subjunctive | |
|---|---|---|
je parle /ʒə paʁl/ | ✅ | identical |
tu parles /ty paʁl/ | ✅ | identical |
il parle /il paʁl/ | ✅ | identical |
nous parlons /nu paʁ.lɔ̃/ | ✅ | parlions /paʁ.ljɔ̃/ — different |
vous parlez /vu paʁ.le/ | ✅ | parliez /paʁ.lje/ — different |
ils parlent /il paʁl/ | ✅ | identical |
So for
-erverbs onlynousandvouschange — and those two look identical to the imperfect. Context tells them apart.This is good news: for the largest verb group in the language, the subjunctive costs you almost nothing.
The eight irregular verbs
| Infinitive | que je | que nous |
|---|---|---|
être /ɛtʁ/ | sois /swa/ | soyons /swa.jɔ̃/ |
avoir /a.vwaʁ/ | aie /ɛ/ | ayons /ɛ.jɔ̃/ |
aller /a.le/ | aille /aj/ | allions /a.ljɔ̃/ |
faire /fɛʁ/ | fasse /fas/ | fassions /fa.sjɔ̃/ |
pouvoir /pu.vwaʁ/ | puisse /pɥis/ | puissions /pɥi.sjɔ̃/ |
savoir /sa.vwaʁ/ | sache /saʃ/ | sachions /sa.ʃjɔ̃/ |
vouloir /vu.lwaʁ/ | veuille /vœj/ | voulions /vu.ljɔ̃/ |
falloir /fa.lwaʁ/ | qu'il faille /kil faj/ | — |
And être and avoir have different endings as well:
être | avoir | |
|---|---|---|
que je /kə ʒə/ | sois /swa/ | aie /ɛ/ |
que tu /kə ty/ | sois /swa/ | aies /ɛ/ |
qu'il /kil/ | soit /swa/ | ait /ɛ/ |
que nous /kə nu/ | soyons /swa.jɔ̃/ | ayons /ɛ.jɔ̃/ |
que vous /kə vu/ | soyez /swa.je/ | ayez /ɛ.je/ |
qu'ils /kil/ | soient /swa/ | aient /ɛ/ |
aieaitaientare all pronounced /ɛ/ — three spellings, one sound.
Four verbs with a double stem
| Infinitive | que je | que nous |
|---|---|---|
venir /və.niʁ/ | vienne /vjɛn/ | venions /və.njɔ̃/ |
prendre /pʁɑ̃dʁ/ | prenne /pʁɛn/ | prenions /pʁə.njɔ̃/ |
boire /bwaʁ/ | boive /bwav/ | buvions /by.vjɔ̃/ |
devoir /də.vwaʁ/ | doive /dwav/ | devions /də.vjɔ̃/ |
When it appears
The subjunctive never appears on its own — always after que and always after a trigger. The full list is in subjonctif-declencheurs; in summary:
| Group | Example | Pronunciation |
|---|---|---|
| necessity and wanting | Il faut que… Je veux que… | /il fo kə/ · /ʒə vø kə/ |
| emotion | Je suis content que… J'ai peur que… | /ʒə sɥi kɔ̃.tɑ̃ kə/ · /ʒe pœʁ kə/ |
| doubt and denial | Je ne pense pas que… Il est possible que… | /ʒə nə pɑ̃s pa kə/ · /il ɛ pɔ.sibl kə/ |
Examples
| English | French | Pronunciation |
|---|---|---|
| I have to go. | Il faut que je parte. | /il fo kə ʒə paʁt/ |
| I want you to come. | Je veux que tu viennes. | /ʒə vø kə ty vjɛn/ |
| I'm glad you're here. | Je suis content que tu sois là. | /ʒə sɥi kɔ̃.tɑ̃ kə ty swa la/ |
| I don't think it's true. | Je ne pense pas que ce soit vrai. | /ʒə nə pɑ̃s pa kə sə swa vʁɛ/ |
| It might rain. | Il est possible qu'il pleuve. | /i.l‿ɛ pɔ.sibl kil plœv/ |
| You need to know this. | Il faut que tu saches ça. | /il fo kə ty saʃ sa/ |
| I'm afraid he won't come. | J'ai peur qu'il ne vienne pas. | /ʒe pœʁ kil nə vjɛn pa/ |
| We need to be able to. | Il faut que nous puissions. | /il fo kə nu pɥi.sjɔ̃/ |
| Although he's ill. | Bien qu'il soit malade. | /bjɛ̃ kil swa ma.lad/ |
| Before you go. | Avant que tu partes. | /a.vɑ̃ kə ty paʁt/ |
Look at row two. English says "I want you to come" — an infinitive with its own subject. French has no such construction: it must be
Je veux que tu viennes, a full clause withqueand a subjunctive. Whenever your English sentence has "want somebody to do something", "ask somebody to do something", "would like somebody to do something", French needsque+ subjunctive.
Common mistakes
| ❌ | ✅ | Why |
|---|---|---|
Il faut que je pars. | … que je parte. | il faut que requires the subjunctive |
que nous prennions | que nous prenions | nous comes from the nous stem |
que je suis | que je sois | être is irregular |
que j'ai | que j'aie | avoir is irregular |
Je pense que ce soit vrai. | … que c'est vrai. | Positive penser takes the indicative |
Je veux toi venir. | Je veux que tu viennes. | No "want you to" construction in French |
que je vais | que j'aille | aller is irregular |
That fifth one matters:
Je pense quetakes the indicative, butJe ne pense pas quetakes the subjunctive. The same forcroireandtrouver.
What the subjunctive is actually doing
a proposition that is not being asserted
The indicative presents something as a fact. The subjunctive does not.
| Pronunciation | ||
|---|---|---|
Je sais qu'il est là. | I present his being there as a fact | /ʒə sɛ kil ɛ la/ |
Je doute qu'il soit là. | I do not present it | /ʒə dut kil swa la/ |
Je veux qu'il soit là. | not a fact yet — a wish | /ʒə vø kil swa la/ |
Je suis content qu'il soit là. | it is a fact, but it is not what I am asserting | /ʒə sɥi kɔ̃.tɑ̃ kil swa la/ |
That last one breaks the simple "doubt → subjunctive" logic — content que takes the subjunctive even though nothing is in doubt.
The reason is that in that sentence his arrival is presupposed, not asserted. What is asserted is my gladness. The subjunctive marks exactly that: this clause is not what I am claiming.
English's surviving subjunctives do the same job, which is why they cluster around the same triggers: "I insist that he be here" (a wish, not a fact), "if I were rich" (contrary to fact). The category is not foreign — only its scope is.
The biggest concrete difference: English "I don't think that he is here" keeps the indicative; French switches to the subjunctive — Je ne pense pas qu'il soit là, with soit rather than est. Negating or questioning a verb of opinion flips the mood in French and does nothing in English. That is the single most frequent error on this page.