Is living in the countryside better for your health? (Oral expression, task 3)
The task
4 min 30 · no preparationVous allez exprimer votre point de vue sur une question de société, sans préparation. Vous parlez seul(e), de façon continue, pendant environ 4 minutes 30. L'examinateur vous écoute et n'intervient pas.
Question : Selon vous, le fait de vivre à la campagne permet-il d'être en meilleure santé que de vivre en ville ? Donnez votre opinion et appuyez-la par des arguments et des exemples précis.
TCF Canada — expression orale — tâche 3
Translation of the prompt
ستعبّر عن وجهة نظرك في قضية مجتمعية، دون تحضير مسبق. تتكلم وحدك وبشكل متواصل لمدة 4 دقائق و30 ثانية تقريباً. يستمع إليك الممتحِن ولا يتدخل. السؤال: برأيك، هل تتيح الحياة في الريف صحة أفضل من الحياة في المدينة؟ أعطِ رأيك ودعّمه بحجج وأمثلة دقيقة.
Translation of the prompt
You are going to express your point of view on a social issue, without preparation. You speak alone, continuously, for about 4 minutes 30 seconds. The examiner listens to you and does not intervene. Question: In your opinion, does living in the countryside allow you to be healthier than living in the city? Give your opinion and support it with precise arguments and examples.
Translation of the prompt
شما نظر خود را دربارهی یک مسئلهی اجتماعی و بدون آمادگی قبلی بیان میکنید. بهتنهایی و بهطور پیوسته، حدود ۴ دقیقه و ۳۰ ثانیه صحبت میکنید. ممتحن به شما گوش میدهد و دخالت نمیکند. سؤال: به نظر شما، آیا زندگی در روستا امکان میدهد که سلامتی بهتری نسبت به زندگی در شهر داشته باشیم؟ نظر خود را بیان کنید و آن را با استدلالها و مثالهای مشخص تقویت کنید.
How to structure your answer
Introduction (30 seconds): rephrase the question in your own words and announce a balanced position: the countryside favours some aspects of health, but the city has its own strengths. For example: "À mon avis, la réponse n'est pas aussi simple qu'on le pense."
Argument 1 (1 minute): the advantages of the countryside: cleaner air, less noise and stress, natural physical activity, more local and fresher food. Give one concrete example for each point.
Argument 2 (1 minute): the limits of the countryside: distance from hospitals and specialists, shortage of doctors, longer emergency response times, isolation of elderly people. Introduce the contrast with "Cependant".
Argument 3 (1 minute): the strengths and weaknesses of the city: access to care, prevention, organised sport, but also pollution, sedentary habits, stress and a fast pace of life. Use a Canadian example: rural Quebec or the North compared with Montreal or Toronto. Open with "À l'inverse".
Conclusion (30 seconds): health depends above all on lifestyle and access to care; the ideal is a balance, for instance a mid-sized town or a suburb close to nature. Close with "En définitive" and thank the examiner.
Time management: aim for the full 4 minutes 30 with three developed arguments, varied connectors and natural pauses, so that you sound spontaneous and not memorised.
Model answer
about 443 wordsBonjour. La question qui m'est posée est de savoir si vivre à la campagne permet d'être en meilleure santé que vivre en ville. À mon avis, la réponse n'est pas aussi simple qu'on le pense : la campagne offre de vrais avantages pour la santé, mais elle présente aussi des limites importantes, et je crois que le mode de vie compte plus que le lieu lui-même.
Commençons par les atouts de la campagne. D'abord, l'air y est généralement plus pur. Dans les grandes villes comme Toronto ou Montréal, les voitures et les industries produisent beaucoup de pollution, ce qui peut aggraver l'asthme et les maladies respiratoires, surtout chez les enfants. Ensuite, la campagne est plus calme. Le bruit permanent de la circulation augmente le stress et perturbe le sommeil, alors qu'en milieu rural on dort mieux et on se sent plus détendu. Enfin, le quotidien y est souvent plus actif : on marche, on jardine, on s'occupe de son terrain, et l'on a plus facilement accès à des produits locaux et frais, comme les légumes d'un voisin ou les œufs d'une ferme.
Cependant, la campagne a aussi des inconvénients majeurs, notamment en matière d'accès aux soins. Au Canada, beaucoup de régions rurales manquent de médecins de famille, et les hôpitaux sont parfois à plusieurs heures de route. En cas d'urgence, comme une crise cardiaque ou un accident, chaque minute compte, et cette distance peut devenir dangereuse. De plus, les personnes âgées peuvent se retrouver isolées, sans transport ni services de proximité, ce qui nuit aussi à leur santé mentale.
À l'inverse, la ville possède des avantages que l'on oublie souvent. On y trouve des hôpitaux spécialisés, des cliniques, des campagnes de prévention et des programmes de dépistage. Les habitants peuvent aussi profiter de salles de sport, de parcs et de pistes cyclables. Mais, bien sûr, la ville a ses défauts : la sédentarité, la malbouffe, le manque de temps et le stress du travail pèsent sur la santé. Par exemple, une personne qui passe deux heures par jour dans les transports en commun a peu de temps pour se reposer ou faire du sport.
En définitive, je pense que l'on ne peut pas affirmer que la campagne est toujours meilleure pour la santé. Une personne qui fume, mange mal et ne bouge pas sera en mauvaise santé, qu'elle habite à Montréal ou dans un petit village. Ce qui compte, c'est l'équilibre : une bonne hygiène de vie et un accès rapide aux soins. Personnellement, je trouve que l'idéal est une ville de taille moyenne, ou une banlieue proche de la nature, qui combine un environnement sain et des services de santé accessibles. Je vous remercie de votre attention.
Show the translation
Hello. The question I have been asked is whether living in the countryside makes it possible to be in better health than living in the city. In my opinion, the answer is not as simple as people think: the countryside offers real advantages for health, but it also has significant limits, and I believe that lifestyle matters more than the place itself.
Let's begin with the strengths of the countryside. First, the air is generally cleaner there. In big cities like Toronto or Montréal, cars and industries produce a lot of pollution, which can worsen asthma and respiratory diseases, especially in children. Next, the countryside is quieter. The constant noise of traffic increases stress and disturbs sleep, whereas in a rural setting people sleep better and feel more relaxed. Finally, daily life there is often more active: people walk, garden, look after their land, and have easier access to local, fresh products, such as a neighbour's vegetables or eggs from a farm.
However, the countryside also has major drawbacks, particularly in terms of access to care. In Canada, many rural regions lack family doctors, and hospitals are sometimes several hours away by road. In an emergency, such as a heart attack or an accident, every minute counts, and this distance can become dangerous. Moreover, older people may find themselves isolated, without transport or local services, which also harms their mental health.
Conversely, the city has advantages that are often forgotten. There you find specialised hospitals, clinics, prevention campaigns and screening programmes. Residents can also make use of gyms, parks and cycle paths. But of course, the city has its faults: a sedentary lifestyle, junk food, lack of time and work stress weigh on health. For example, a person who spends two hours a day on public transport has little time to rest or do sport.
Ultimately, I think we cannot claim that the countryside is always better for health. A person who smokes, eats badly and does not move will be in poor health, whether they live in Montréal or in a small village. What matters is balance: a good lifestyle and quick access to care. Personally, I find that the ideal is a medium-sized city, or a suburb close to nature, which combines a healthy environment with accessible health services. Thank you for your attention.
Key vocabulary
| Word or phrase | Meaning |
|---|---|
| la qualité de l'air | air quality: how clean or polluted the air you breathe is |
| la pollution atmosphérique | air pollution: harmful substances in the air, often caused by cars and factories |
| le milieu rural | rural environment: the countryside and sparsely populated areas, as opposed to urban areas |
| la sédentarité | sedentary lifestyle: moving very little and sitting most of the time |
| l'accès aux soins | access to healthcare: being able to see a doctor or go to hospital easily |
| la pénurie de médecins | doctor shortage: not enough doctors to meet the population's needs |
| l'hygiène de vie | lifestyle (healthy living): the set of habits that affect health, such as diet, exercise and sleep |
| le dépistage | screening: a medical test used to detect a disease early |
| l'isolement | isolation: the situation of a person who sees few people and feels lonely |
| un facteur de stress | a stress factor: something that causes nervous tension or anxiety |
| à l'inverse | conversely, on the other hand: a connector that introduces a contrast between two ideas |
| en définitive | ultimately, all things considered: a concluding connector that sums up your final position |
Common mistakes
Making a flat statement with no nuance or example. At this level the examiner expects an argued, balanced position supported by concrete illustrations.
WrongLa campagne est plus saine que la ville.
RightLa campagne offre un air plus pur, mais l'accès aux soins y est plus difficile.
Confusing "la compagne" (a female partner or companion) with "la campagne" (the countryside), both in speech and in writing.
WrongJ'aimerais vivre à la compagne.
RightJ'aimerais vivre à la campagne.
Inventing opinion phrases by mixing structures. Use the fixed expressions "à mon avis" or "de mon point de vue".
WrongJ'ai l'avis que la ville est stressante. / Selon mon point de vue que...
RightÀ mon avis, la ville est stressante. / De mon point de vue, la ville est stressante.
"Bon" and "bien" have irregular comparatives: "meilleur" (adjective) and "mieux" (adverb). "Plus bon" and "plus bien" do not exist in standard French.
WrongC'est plus bon pour la santé. / On dort plus bien.
RightC'est meilleur pour la santé. / On dort mieux.
Wrong prepositions with place names. Say "à la campagne" and "en ville". (Note that "dans la campagne" can exist with another meaning, for a specific stretch of countryside, but it is not the general idea here.)
WrongHabiter dans la campagne / vivre à ville
RightHabiter à la campagne / vivre en ville
Forgetting the agreement ("sains" in the plural) and confusing "sain" (healthy, describing something or someone) with "santé" (the noun). Also, "en bonne santé" is the usual way to describe a person's health.
WrongLes gens qui habitent au village sont plus sain.
RightLes gens qui habitent au village sont plus sains. / Ils sont en meilleure santé.
Stopping too early (around 2 minutes) and repeating the same idea. Prepare three developed arguments with examples so that you can fill the 4 minutes 30.
Speaking too fast or mentally reciting a memorised text. The examiner expects spontaneous speech, with natural pauses and varied connectors (d'abord, en outre, cependant, en définitive).
The grammar this task needs
Comparatives and superlatives (plus / moins / meilleur / mieux)
The question itself is a comparison (healthier in the countryside than in the city). You need to compare accurately, and avoid the classic errors "plus bon" and "plus bien".
- L'air est généralement plus pur à la campagne qu'en ville.
- On dort mieux en milieu rural, car il y a moins de bruit.
- Le mode de vie est meilleur pour la santé quand on bouge régulièrement.
- Il y a moins de médecins à la campagne qu'en ville.
Prepositions with place names: à la campagne, en ville, au village, dans une ville moyenne
The topic constantly contrasts places. Prepositional errors ("dans la campagne", "à ville") are very noticeable and cost points at B2/C1. Note that "dans" is correct when the noun is specified (dans une petite ville, dans le Nord du Québec).
- J'habite à la campagne depuis dix ans.
- Elle vit en ville, à Montréal.
- Mes grands-parents vivent dans un petit village du Québec.
- Les hôpitaux sont parfois à plusieurs heures de route.
Expressing concession and opposition (cependant, pourtant, bien que + subjonctif, alors que)
Your position is nuanced, so you must move from advantages to limits. Concessive and opposing connectors let you do this smoothly. Note that "bien que" is always followed by the subjunctive, while "alors que" takes the indicative.
- Bien que l'air soit plus pur à la campagne, l'accès aux soins y est plus difficile.
- La ville est stressante, alors que la campagne est plus calme.
- Cependant, les urgences peuvent être très éloignées.
- À l'inverse, la ville offre de nombreux services de santé.
Agreement and the difference between sain / santé / en bonne santé
You will say these words often. Mistakes of agreement and of word choice ("sain" vs "santé") are common. "Sain" is an adjective (an environment, a diet) and "la santé" is a noun.
- Un environnement sain favorise la santé.
- Les habitants des villages sont souvent en bonne santé.
- Une alimentation saine passe par des produits frais.
- Les personnes âgées isolées sont plus fragiles.
Phrases to reuse
| Phrase | When to use it |
|---|---|
| La question qui m'est posée est de savoir si + indicatif | To open by rephrasing the question in your own words, which gives you a few seconds to think. |
| À mon avis, / De mon point de vue, / Personnellement, je trouve que + indicatif | To state your opinion clearly. Do not say "j'ai l'avis que". |
| La réponse n'est pas aussi simple qu'on le pense | To announce a nuanced position right from the introduction. |
| Commençons par + nom | To launch your first argument and signal the plan of your talk. |
| D'abord, ... Ensuite, ... Enfin, ... | To order the points within a single argument and sound organised. |
| Cependant, / En revanche, / À l'inverse, ... | To pass from the advantages to the limits, or from the countryside to the city. |
| Par exemple, / Prenons le cas de + nom | To introduce a concrete example, which the task explicitly requires. |
| Cela peut aggraver / favoriser / nuire à + nom | To link a cause to its effect on health, with precise vocabulary. |
| Ce qui compte, c'est + nom | To emphasise the key idea of your argument, especially in the conclusion. |
| On ne peut pas affirmer que + indicatif | To qualify a generalisation and show critical thinking. |
| En définitive, / Pour conclure, je pense que + indicatif | To begin the conclusion and summarise your final position. |
| Je vous remercie de votre attention. | To close the talk politely and signal that you have finished. |
Ideas bank
| Position | Argument | Example |
|---|---|---|
| For the countryside | Cleaner air reduces respiratory problems. | Compared with Toronto or Montréal, a small village has far fewer cars and factories, which is good for children with asthma. |
| For the countryside | Less noise and less stress improve sleep and mental health. | Without constant traffic noise, a person falls asleep more easily and wakes up more rested. |
| For the countryside | Daily life is naturally more active and the food is fresher. | Gardening, walking to a neighbour's house, and buying eggs directly from a farm. |
| Against the countryside | Access to care is harder: shortage of doctors and distant hospitals. | In rural Québec or in the North, a patient may need several hours of driving to reach a specialist. |
| Against the countryside | In an emergency, distance can be fatal. | After a heart attack or a serious accident, every minute counts, and an ambulance may take a long time to arrive. |
| Against the countryside | Isolation harms older people, including their mental health. | An elderly person without a car and without nearby services may go several days without seeing anyone. |
| For the city | Strong healthcare services and prevention. | Specialised hospitals, clinics, screening programmes and awareness campaigns are available in a large city. |
| For the city | Many ways to exercise are available. | Gyms, parks, and cycle paths allow people to stay active even in an urban setting. |
| Against the city | Pollution, sedentary habits and fast pace of life affect health. | Someone who spends two hours a day on public transport has little time to rest or play sport. |
| Nuance | Lifestyle matters more than location. | A smoker with a poor diet and no exercise will be in poor health whether in Montréal or in a small village. |
| Nuance | A compromise is possible: a medium-sized city or a suburb close to nature. | A person living near a park and a hospital can enjoy a healthy environment and quick access to care. |
What the examiner looks for
The examiner is looking for a clear, nuanced opinion that answers the question directly, supported by at least three developed arguments with concrete examples (the Canadian examples help here). Fluency over the full 4 minutes 30 matters: no long silences, no repetition of the same idea, and a clear structure with varied connectors. Accurate grammar (comparatives, prepositions, agreement) and precise health vocabulary (accès aux soins, sédentarité, hygiène de vie) separate B2 from C1. The talk should sound spontaneous, not memorised, and should end with a real conclusion.