Rewarding good school results with money
The task
4 min 30 · no preparationVous êtes face à l'examinateur, sans temps de préparation. Il vous pose la question suivante : « Dans certaines familles, les parents donnent de l'argent à leurs enfants quand ceux-ci réussissent bien à l'école. Que pensez-vous de cette pratique ? » Vous exprimez votre point de vue de manière spontanée, continue et convaincante, en l'appuyant sur des arguments et des exemples. Vous disposez d'environ 4 minutes 30. L'examinateur vous écoute et n'intervient pas pendant votre présentation.
TCF Canada — expression orale — tâche 3
Translation of the prompt
أنت أمام الممتحِن، دون وقت للتحضير. يطرح عليك السؤال التالي: «في بعض الأسر، يعطي الآباء أبناءهم مالًا عندما ينجحون في المدرسة. ما رأيك في هذه الممارسة؟» تعبّر عن وجهة نظرك بشكل عفوي ومتواصل ومقنع، مستندًا إلى حجج وأمثلة. لديك حوالي 4 دقائق و30 ثانية. يستمع إليك الممتحِن ولا يتدخل أثناء عرضك.
Translation of the prompt
You are facing the examiner, with no preparation time. He asks you the following question: "In some families, parents give money to their children when they do well at school. What do you think of this practice?" You express your point of view spontaneously, continuously and convincingly, supporting it with arguments and examples. You have about 4 minutes 30. The examiner listens to you and does not intervene during your presentation.
Translation of the prompt
شما روبهروی ممتحن هستید و زمانی برای آمادهسازی ندارید. او این سؤال را از شما میپرسد: «در برخی خانوادهها، والدین وقتی فرزندانشان در مدرسه خوب درس میخوانند به آنها پول میدهند. دربارهٔ این رفتار چه فکر میکنید؟» شما دیدگاه خود را بهصورت بداهه، پیوسته و متقاعدکننده بیان میکنید و آن را با استدلال و مثال تقویت میکنید. تقریباً ۴ دقیقه و ۳۰ ثانیه وقت دارید. ممتحن به شما گوش میدهد و در طول ارائهٔ شما دخالت نمیکند.
How to structure your answer
Introduction (20 s): rephrase the question in your own words and state your position straight away. Keep it nuanced: money can help, but it should never be the main motivation. Use «La question qui m'est posée est de savoir si…».
First argument (1 min): present the possible positive aspects: recognition of effort, short-term motivation, learning the value of work and how to manage money.
Second argument (1 min 15): develop the risks. Extrinsic motivation replacing the pleasure of learning, pressure, comparisons between siblings, emotional blackmail and the temptation to cheat. This is your strongest part, so take your time.
Personal or observed example (1 min): tell a real situation from your family, your country or people around you, and compare it with Canada if you can. Without a concrete example, you stay at B1 level.
Alternatives and conclusion (1 min): suggest non-material rewards (an outing, time together, congratulations), insist on encouraging effort rather than the grade, then restate your final position. Use «Pour conclure, je ne condamne pas totalement… mais…».
Model answer
about 441 wordsBonjour. La question qui m'est posée est de savoir ce que je pense des parents qui donnent de l'argent à leurs enfants quand ils ont de bons résultats à l'école. C'est un sujet qui divise, et ma position est nuancée : je pense que l'argent peut parfois encourager un enfant, mais qu'il ne devrait jamais devenir la raison principale pour laquelle il étudie.
Commençons par les avantages. Pour beaucoup de parents, offrir une somme d'argent est une manière concrète de reconnaître les efforts de leur enfant. Un élève qui a travaillé pendant tout un trimestre est fier de recevoir une récompense. De plus, cela peut lui apprendre que le travail mérite un salaire et l'aider à gérer son argent : s'il reçoit une petite somme, il apprend à épargner ou à choisir ses dépenses. Dans certaines familles où l'école est peu valorisée, cette méthode peut même donner un premier déclic.
Cependant, je vois surtout des risques. Le premier, c'est que l'enfant finit par étudier pour l'argent et non pour apprendre. Les psychologues parlent de motivation extrinsèque : dès que la récompense disparaît, l'envie de travailler disparaît aussi. Le deuxième risque, c'est la pression. Un enfant qui sait que son père attend une très bonne note pour lui donner de l'argent peut avoir peur de l'échec, être stressé, voire être tenté de tricher. Enfin, cela crée des injustices : un enfant qui a plus de facilité gagnera davantage que son frère qui fait pourtant beaucoup d'efforts.
Je peux donner un exemple de mon entourage. Dans mon quartier, un voisin donnait cinquante dollars à son fils pour chaque bulletin supérieur à quatorze sur vingt. Au début, le garçon travaillait beaucoup. Mais au collège, quand les matières sont devenues plus difficiles, il a négocié le prix de chaque note et il a perdu tout intérêt quand son père a arrêté de payer. Au Canada, où beaucoup de familles insistent sur l'autonomie et le plaisir d'apprendre, on voit plutôt des parents qui valorisent l'effort que la note elle-même.
À mon avis, il existe de meilleures solutions. Les parents peuvent organiser une sortie en famille, un repas préféré ou une activité que l'enfant aime. Surtout, ils peuvent féliciter l'enfant pour son travail et sa persévérance, même si le résultat n'est pas parfait. Ces gestes renforcent la confiance en soi et ne transforment pas l'école en transaction commerciale.
Pour conclure, je ne condamne pas totalement cette pratique si elle reste occasionnelle et symbolique, mais je pense qu'elle présente trop de risques quand elle devient systématique. L'éducation doit apprendre aux enfants que le savoir a une valeur en lui-même, et c'est ce message que les parents devraient transmettre avant tout. Merci.
Show the translation
Hello. The question put to me is what I think of parents who give money to their children when they get good results at school. It is a subject that divides opinion, and my position is nuanced: I think that money can sometimes encourage a child, but that it should never become the main reason why he studies.
Let us start with the advantages. For many parents, giving a sum of money is a concrete way of recognising their child's efforts. A pupil who has worked for a whole term is proud to receive a reward. Moreover, it can teach him that work deserves a wage and help him manage his money: if he receives a small sum, he learns to save or to choose his expenses. In some families where school is little valued, this method can even provide a first spark.
However, I mainly see risks. The first is that the child ends up studying for the money and not to learn. Psychologists speak of extrinsic motivation: as soon as the reward disappears, the desire to work disappears too. The second risk is pressure. A child who knows that his father expects a very good grade before giving him money may be afraid of failure, be stressed, or even be tempted to cheat. Finally, it creates injustices: a child who finds things easier will earn more than his brother who nevertheless makes a great deal of effort.
I can give an example from the people around me. In my neighbourhood, a neighbour gave his son fifty dollars for every report card above fourteen out of twenty. At first, the boy worked hard. But in middle school, when the subjects became more difficult, he negotiated the price of each grade and lost all interest when his father stopped paying. In Canada, where many families insist on autonomy and the pleasure of learning, one sees rather parents who value the effort more than the grade itself.
In my opinion, there are better solutions. Parents can organise a family outing, a favourite meal or an activity that the child enjoys. Above all, they can congratulate the child for his work and his perseverance, even if the result is not perfect. These gestures strengthen self-confidence and do not turn school into a commercial transaction.
To conclude, I do not totally condemn this practice if it remains occasional and symbolic, but I think it presents too many risks when it becomes systematic. Education must teach children that knowledge has a value in itself, and this is the message that parents should convey above all. Thank you.
Key vocabulary
| Word or phrase | Meaning |
|---|---|
| la motivation extrinsèque | motivation that comes from an outside reward (money, a gift) rather than from personal enjoyment |
| la motivation intrinsèque | motivation that comes from enjoyment or personal interest in the activity itself |
| récompenser | to reward: to give someone something to thank or congratulate them for an effort |
| un bulletin scolaire | school report: the document showing a pupil's grades and teachers' comments |
| valoriser l'effort | to show that the work put in counts as much as the result |
| la persévérance | perseverance: the quality of someone who keeps going despite difficulties |
| l'argent de poche | pocket money: a small sum given regularly to a child for personal spending |
| épargner | to save: to put money aside instead of spending it |
| exercer une pression sur quelqu'un | to put pressure on someone: to push them to succeed, which can cause stress |
| le chantage affectif | emotional blackmail: using love or affection to get someone to behave in a certain way |
| un déclic | a sudden realisation that changes someone's attitude (a 'lightbulb moment') |
| à mon avis / selon moi | in my opinion: expressions used to introduce a personal view |
Common mistakes
Answering only 'yes' or 'no' is not enough. In task 3 you must develop your view for the whole 4 min 30 with arguments and examples.
WrongOui, je suis d'accord. C'est bien.
RightC'est un sujet qui divise, et ma position est nuancée : l'argent peut encourager, mais…
Spelling and agreement: 'résultats' is written with a t, and the adjective 'scolaires' agrees in the plural with 'notes'.
Wrongles notes scolaire
Rightles notes scolaires
Do not use 'je suis d'accord que' in place of 'je pense que'. Say 'je suis d'accord avec cette idée' or simply 'je pense que'.
WrongJe suis d'accord que l'argent motive les enfants.
RightJe pense que l'argent motive les enfants.
After 'il faut que' and 'bien que', use the subjunctive, not the indicative.
WrongIl faut que les parents encouragent… / Bien que l'argent peut aider
RightBien que l'argent puisse aider, il faut que les parents encouragent l'effort.
'Malgré que' is considered incorrect in careful speech. Use 'bien que' (with the subjunctive) or 'même si' (with the indicative).
WrongMalgré que l'argent aide, c'est risqué.
RightBien que l'argent aide, c'est risqué. / Même si l'argent aide, c'est risqué.
Use the indirect object: you give money to the children, not 'for' them.
Wrongdonner de l'argent pour les enfants
Rightdonner de l'argent à leurs enfants
The construction is 'motiver / pousser quelqu'un à + infinitive'. Do not use 'de' here.
Wrongmotiver les enfants de étudier
Rightmotiver les enfants à étudier
Repeating 'et puis' or 'donc' makes your speech monotonous. Use varied connectors to structure your argument.
WrongEt puis l'argent est bien, et puis c'est risqué, donc…
RightD'une part, l'argent reconnaît l'effort ; d'autre part, il peut créer de la pression.
Speaking too fast or searching for words in silence hurts your fluency. Use rephrasing phrases to buy time.
An opinion without a concrete example usually stays at B1 level. Always include a personal or observed example.
The grammar this task needs
The subjunctive after expressions of necessity and concession (il faut que, bien que)
When you give your opinion and recommend what parents should do, you will constantly need 'il faut que' and 'bien que'. Using the subjunctive correctly is a clear sign of B2/C1 level. Note: 'bien que' always takes the subjunctive, whereas 'même si' takes the indicative.
- Il faut que les parents encouragent l'effort plutôt que la note.
- Bien que l'argent puisse motiver un enfant, il ne doit pas devenir le but principal.
- Je ne pense pas que cette pratique soit toujours bénéfique.
- Il vaut mieux que la famille organise une sortie plutôt que de donner de l'argent.
Logical connectors to organise and contrast your arguments
For 4 min 30 of continuous speech, the examiner must hear a clear structure: advantages, then risks, then an example, then a conclusion. Connectors prevent you from repeating 'et puis' and 'donc'.
- D'une part, l'argent reconnaît l'effort ; d'autre part, il peut remplacer le plaisir d'apprendre.
- Cependant, je vois surtout des risques.
- En revanche, une sortie en famille renforce les liens.
- Par ailleurs, cela peut créer des injustices entre frères et sœurs.
- En conclusion, je ne condamne pas totalement cette pratique.
Verb constructions with an indirect object and an infinitive (donner à quelqu'un, pousser quelqu'un à)
The topic is about giving money to children and pushing them to study. Learners often make mistakes with the prepositions (pour/à/de), which are noticed by the examiner.
- Les parents donnent de l'argent à leurs enfants.
- Cette méthode peut pousser l'élève à étudier uniquement pour la récompense.
- On encourage les enfants à persévérer malgré les difficultés.
- Il est tenté de tricher pour obtenir la somme promise.
Expressing hypothesis and consequence (si + présent → futur / conditionnel)
To make your argument convincing, you need to show what happens if parents pay for grades and what could happen instead. This allows you to develop ideas at length.
- Si l'enfant reçoit de l'argent chaque fois, il étudiera pour la somme et non pour apprendre.
- Si les parents valorisaient davantage l'effort, les enfants auraient plus confiance en eux.
- Dès que la récompense disparaît, l'envie de travailler disparaît aussi.
Phrases to reuse
| Phrase | When to use it |
|---|---|
| La question qui m'est posée est de savoir si… | To open by rephrasing the examiner's question in your own words, which fills the first 20 seconds. |
| C'est un sujet qui divise, et ma position est nuancée. | To announce right away that your opinion is balanced rather than all-or-nothing. |
| Commençons par les avantages. | To signal the move to your first argument and make your structure easy to follow. |
| Cependant, je vois surtout des risques. | To pivot from the positive aspects to your main objection. |
| Le premier risque, c'est que… Le deuxième, c'est que… | To list several points in order without repeating yourself. |
| Je peux donner un exemple de mon entourage. | To introduce your personal or observed example, which is what lifts you above B1. |
| Autrement dit, / C'est-à-dire que… | To gain a few seconds and clarify an idea when you are searching for a word. |
| À mon avis, / Selon moi, | To introduce your personal opinion clearly. |
| Il existe de meilleures solutions : … | To move to the alternatives section before your conclusion. |
| Surtout, les parents peuvent + infinitif | To stress the most important suggestion among several. |
| Pour conclure, je ne condamne pas totalement… mais je pense que… | To restate your nuanced final position in the conclusion. |
| Au Canada, on voit plutôt… | To make a comparison with Canada, as the plan suggests. |
Ideas bank
| Position | Argument | Example |
|---|---|---|
| For | Money recognises the child's effort in a concrete way. | A pupil who worked hard for a whole term is proud to receive a reward and feels his work is valued. |
| For | It teaches the value of work and money management. | With a small sum, the child learns to save for a bicycle or to choose between several purchases. |
| For | It can trigger motivation in families or situations where school is little valued. | A teenager who has given up on school may get a first 'déclic' when he sees that his efforts bring a result. |
| Against | Extrinsic motivation replaces the pleasure of learning. | Once the parents stop paying, the child no longer sees any reason to open his books. |
| Against | Pressure and fear of failure. | A child who knows his father expects a very good grade to give him money may become stressed or even be tempted to cheat. |
| Against | Injustice and comparisons between siblings. | A child who finds school easy earns more than his brother, who works much harder but has average grades. |
| Against | Risk of negotiation and emotional blackmail. | In my neighbour's family, the son negotiated the price of each grade and lost interest as soon as the payments stopped. |
| Nuance | An occasional, symbolic gift is not the same as a systematic payment. | A small present at the end of the year for overall effort is very different from fifty dollars for every grade above 14/20. |
| Nuance | Non-material rewards are more lasting. | A family outing, a favourite meal, time spent together or sincere congratulations build self-confidence. |
| Nuance | Reward the effort and perseverance rather than the grade. | Congratulating a child who improved from 8 to 11 out of 20 values his progress, even if the result is not perfect. |
What the examiner looks for
The examiner is looking for a clear position stated at the start and kept coherent until the conclusion, supported by developed arguments rather than a quick yes or no. The full 4 min 30 must be used, with a visible structure (introduction, advantages, risks, example, alternatives, conclusion) and varied connectors. A concrete personal or observed example, ideally with a comparison to Canada, is essential to reach B2/C1. Accurate grammar (subjunctive after 'bien que' and 'il faut que', correct prepositions) and precise vocabulary (motivation extrinsèque, valoriser l'effort, exercer une pression) will be rewarded, as will a fluent delivery that uses rephrasing strategies instead of silences.