ROSS COULTHART DROPS SHOCKING NEW UFO STATEMENTS

The question is not really the crafter reel anymore. It is who gets to decide what you're allowed to hear. A journalist just refused to call a stack of leaked documents fake. A weapon the president admitted using is showing up in old reports of craft being pulled out of the sky.

And a former insider was denied, confirmed, then denied again. All on record. And none of that is a coincidence. It keeps pointing to the same thing.

Real evidence released on someone else's timeline. Hey, ufologers, I'm Christina Gomez, and this is your UFO News Update. On NewsNation, Ross addressed the leak's CORET files. Now, CORET stands for Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology.

The pages show diagrams of what is labeled recovered non-human hardware, notes on pulling apart its components, and a written symbolic language no one has decoded that we know of. and they first appeared online back in 2007, posted by a man who claimed he reverse-engineered

a cover to craft at a lab in Palo Alto, California. Most people filed them under internet hoaxes, but Ross doesn't agree. It's a 1986 primer on findings from these ET artifacts, and it described extraction processes, component analysis, and integration effects. And there's also pages from a linguistic analysis primer featuring complex diagrams and an elaborate symbolic alien language,

self-executing or functional. I can't dismiss this case for reasons I cannot disclose. It's an ongoing investigation for me. I've got a hunch about who PACL Correct were and people involved. He says he has a lead on who produced the documents and can't reveal it yet. His argument against the hoax label in this case is kind of interesting and maybe a little

bit practical. A fake this detail, 50 pages of engineering and invented language, buys the hoax or nothing and no one ever stepped forward to take any credit. If he is right about who made them, the correct pages stop being talked about and start being

proof you can actually hold. That same idea surfaced in a second claim, and this one ties to a weapon the president has already confirmed. In January, during the raid that captured Nicolas Maduro, Trump told the New York Post that United States forces used a device he called the discombobulator, which shut down enemy equipment before a shot was fired. Guards on the ground

reportedly collapsed, vomiting and bleeding from a sound that people say wasn't there. Reporting points to a high-powered microwave system, also known as an HPM. Ross's focus is on where the technology has come up before. It's interesting because in that context, we know that HPMs, high-pulse microwaves,

have been used allegedly to down non-human craft. And we know from what Trump said, President Trump said, that these had been used for remote electronic disablement of enemy threats, drones, missile systems, electronics, and radars. A sitting president confirmed a directed energy

weapon on a live operation, and the same class of weapons shows up in years of claims that the U.S. has forced craft down and recovered them. Ross ties this to the Havana syndrome cases as well, where personnel report the same injuries with no cause that the government will name. Other governments now know the weapon works, which means it can be aimed back to American forces.

And that is exactly what the people running this fear most. It is why the work is buried so deep that even senior officials don't have the full picture. And that is not by accident. Which brings us to the other half of the cover-up, the part that is supposed to be impossible. We covered the J.D. Vance interview with Joe Rogan last week, so here is just the very short version.

J.D. Vance said a secret this large could not stay hidden because someone would have leaked it by now. Most people did not agree with that statement, and researcher UAP Gerb had something to say about that as well. Here's what he stated on the Hill. I would certainly contest that argument and say that this sort of secret has leaked plenty of times in the past.

We have former Air Force major and very seasoned intelligence officer David Grush, who testified in 2023 before Congress about the existence of coordinated crash retrieval, reverse engineering programs and monitoring programs of non-human technical vehicles. His point is that the leak already happened, and it happened inside the system meant to contain it. The 2023 congressional testimony about crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs is on the public record. Whistleblower complaints ran through the intelligence community's own inspector general first,

which means the disclosure moved through official channels before they ever reached the public. Then GERB took a line other officials have leaned on and then turned it back around. Former President Obama once joked that if the government were hiding alien craft, some staffer would have taken a selfie with it by now,

which is the exact same thing Vance just said on Joe Rogan last week. Huh. Is that a coincidence? Is the vice president right that a secret this size couldn't survive, or does GURB have a stronger case?

You tell me. Because GURB's deeper argument is not that people stay silent. It is that most people inside the programs never hold enough information to leak anything that is worth leaking.

They don't have the full picture. Access is split across compartments so people can work a piece of the effort for years without knowing what the whole thing is or even what it is about. And he pointed to the entire intelligence agency, the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, that ran covert operations for years before the public was ever told that it even existed.

An agency stayed completely hidden. Not a file, not a photo, just this one agency that nobody knew about. That's a pretty big secret to hold, don't you think? Well, I think the United States is extremely good at keeping secrets, has a special access program, SAP, and national program ecosystem that is completely catered towards compartmenting covert information.