CELPIP Speaking Task 1: Giving Advice (Templates + Sample Answers by Band)
Task 1 gives you 30 seconds to prepare and 90 seconds to advise someone on a decision. Here is the structure, the phrase bank, and three sample answers at CLB 7, 9, and 11.

1What CELPIP Speaking Task 1 is
CELPIP Speaking Task 1 is called Giving Advice, and it is the first of the eight tasks in the Speaking component. You are shown a short situation in which someone you know — a friend, a relative, a coworker — is facing a decision or a problem. Your job is to speak directly to that person and tell them what you think they should do, and why.
The prompt is presented on screen, and it is also read aloud to you, so you both see and hear the situation. Usually the person is choosing between two options, or trying to solve a small dilemma. You are expected to make a clear recommendation — pick a side, or propose a concrete course of action — and then back it up with reasons. Sitting on the fence is not advice; it is hesitation, and the examiner notices.
Think of it as a real conversation, not a presentation. You are talking to one person, you care about their problem, and you want to help them decide. The examiner is not looking for a perfect, scripted speech. They want clear, specific, well-reasoned advice delivered in a natural, friendly voice.
Task 1 is not 'describe the situation.' It is 'tell this person what to do, and give them solid reasons to trust your advice.' A clear recommendation plus two or three concrete reasons is the whole game.
2Timing & format
Task 1 runs on a fixed, automated clock — there is no human examiner pacing you, so you have to manage the time yourself. The structure is the same every time, which is good news: you can rehearse to the exact rhythm of the task.
The 90 seconds is the part most test-takers underestimate. It is longer than it sounds. A rushed answer that runs out of things to say at 50 seconds leaves a long, awkward silence that hurts your score. A strong answer fills the time comfortably — recommendation, two developed reasons, a nod to the other option, and a warm closing line.
Plan to fill all 90 seconds, but pace yourself so you are not racing. Aim to finish your final sentence around the 85-second mark. Practise with a real timer until the rhythm feels automatic — that is how you stop running out of words halfway through.
3How Task 1 is scored
Every CELPIP Speaking task, including Task 1, is rated on the same four dimensions. Knowing what each one rewards lets you aim your advice at the criteria instead of guessing.
Is your advice clear, relevant, and logically organised? For Task 1 this means a definite recommendation, reasons that actually support it, and ideas that flow in a sensible order rather than jumping around. A clear 'I think you should take the second job, and here is why' scores far higher than a vague 'well, both have pros and cons.'
Do you use a precise, varied range of words — and do you use them correctly? Repeating 'good,' 'better,' and 'nice' caps you. Words like commute, work-life balance, manageable, and long-term suit this task and lift the score, as long as they fit naturally.
Is your speech easy and pleasant to follow? This covers pronunciation, natural intonation, smooth pacing, and clear linking between ideas. A heavy accent is fine; constant hesitation, long pauses, and flat, robotic delivery are not. The rater should be able to follow you without effort.
Did you actually do what the task asked — give advice to that person about that situation? If you describe the situation but never recommend anything, or you advise on the wrong problem, task fulfilment drops sharply no matter how good your English is.
The four dimensions reinforce each other. Clear, well-reasoned advice (Content) is easier to follow (Listenability) and obviously answers the prompt (Task Fulfilment). Fix your structure first — vocabulary and delivery have something solid to sit on top of.
4The winning structure for Task 1
Do not improvise the shape of your answer. Use the same five-step skeleton every time and just pour the specific situation into it. This guarantees a clear recommendation, real reasons, and a full 90 seconds.
Memorise this skeleton, not a script. The five steps are fixed; the words change with each prompt. If you can hit all five steps in 90 seconds, you have already satisfied Content, Coherence, and Task Fulfilment before you say a single fancy word.
5Useful phrases for giving advice
Build a small bank of go-to phrases for each part of the structure. With these ready, you spend your 30 seconds of prep choosing content, not searching for how to start a sentence. Drop them in naturally — do not stack three in a row.
'If I were you, I'd…', 'Honestly, I think you should…', 'I'd strongly suggest…', 'My advice would be to…', 'If it were my decision, I'd definitely…'. Pick one and commit to a single option early so your recommendation is impossible to miss.
'The main reason is…', 'What really matters here is…', 'The thing is…', 'Just think about it — …', 'On top of that…', 'And there's another thing to consider…'. Use these to introduce and then stack your reasons so the rater hears clear support, not just an opinion.
'I know the other job pays more, but…', 'I get that the first option is tempting, however…', 'Sure, that side has its perks, but at the end of the day…', 'You might be thinking about the money, and that's fair, but…'. These show maturity and make your final recommendation more convincing.
'Whatever you decide, I'm behind you…', 'At the end of the day, it's your call, but I'd go with…', 'Trust me on this one.', 'You've got this — I really think the second option is the way to go.'. A warm closing fills your final seconds and leaves a strong last impression.
6Sample answer at CLB 7
Here is the shared scenario used for all three sample answers: 'Your cousin has been offered two jobs — one with higher pay but very long hours, the other with lower pay but more free time and a shorter commute. Give your cousin advice on which job to take.' Below is a competent CLB 7 response — clear and correct, but simple, with basic connectors and limited range.
Hey, I heard you got two job offers, that's great news. But I know it's a hard choice, so let me help you. If I were you, I would take the second job, the one with lower pay. I know the first job pays more money, but I think the second one is better for you. The first reason is the free time. The second job gives you more free time, so you can rest and see your family and friends. That is very important. If you work very long hours, you will be tired all the time and you will not be happy. The second reason is the commute. The second job has a shorter commute, so you don't waste time on the road every day. You can use that time for yourself. I know the money is less, but money is not everything. Your health and your happiness are more important than a higher salary. So my advice is, take the second job. I think you will be happier with more free time and a short commute. Whatever you decide, I support you, but I really think the second one is better. Good luck, cousin.
Why this is CLB 7: the advice is clear and the answer is fully on task — there is a definite recommendation, two reasons, and a nod to the other option. But the language stays basic. Connectors are simple ('so,' 'but,' 'and'), vocabulary is plain ('free time,' 'tired,' 'happy,' 'more money'), and sentence patterns repeat ('The first reason is… The second reason is…'). It communicates well and fulfils the task, but it lacks the range, precision, and natural flow that push a response higher.
7Sample answer at CLB 9
Same scenario — your cousin choosing between the higher-paying, long-hours job and the lower-paying job with more free time and a shorter commute. This CLB 9 response keeps the same structure but adds clearer organisation, more varied vocabulary, and some idiomatic phrasing.
Hey, so you're trying to decide between those two job offers — that's a great problem to have, but I can see why you're torn. Honestly, if I were in your shoes, I'd go with the second job, the one with lower pay. Hear me out. The main reason is work-life balance. That second job gives you a lot more free time, which means you can actually switch off after work, recharge, and spend real time with the people you care about. A job that swallows all your evenings might pay well, but it tends to burn you out fast. On top of that, there's the commute. A shorter commute doesn't just save you money — it gives you back an hour or two every single day, and over a year that really adds up. Now, I know the first job is tempting because the salary is higher, and that's a fair point. But here's the thing: a bigger paycheque isn't worth much if you're too exhausted to enjoy it. Money matters, but so does your health and your peace of mind. So my honest advice is to take the second job. The pay is lower, sure, but the lifestyle is so much better. At the end of the day it's your call, but trust me — I really think you'll be happier with that one.
Why this is CLB 9: the structure is sharper and the reasons are genuinely developed, each tied to a clear consequence. Vocabulary is noticeably wider and more precise ('work-life balance,' 'recharge,' 'burn you out,' 'peace of mind'), and there is natural idiomatic phrasing ('in your shoes,' 'hear me out,' 'it's your call'). Connectors are more varied ('on top of that,' 'here's the thing,' 'at the end of the day'). It flows smoothly and sounds like real advice — but it is still slightly more controlled and less effortless than a top-band answer.
8Sample answer at CLB 11
The same cousin, the same two jobs. This CLB 11 response shows what a sophisticated answer sounds like: natural hedging, precise vocabulary, nuance, and an effortless conversational rhythm — without ever losing the clear recommendation.
Okay, so you've got these two offers on the table and you're not sure which way to jump — totally understandable, because on paper they pull in opposite directions. But if you want my honest take, I'd lean pretty firmly toward the second job, even though it pays less. Let me walk you through why. For me, the biggest factor by far is sustainability. That higher-paying role with the brutal hours might feel exciting for the first few months, but a schedule like that has a way of quietly draining you — your energy, your relationships, your appetite for the work itself. The second job, with its lighter hours, actually leaves room for a life outside the office, and that's what keeps people going long-term. The second thing I'd weigh is the commute. A shorter trip might sound like a minor perk, but realistically it hands you back hours every week and spares you a daily dose of stress before you've even started working. That compounds over time in a way salary alone never quite captures. Now, I'm not pretending the money doesn't matter — a fatter paycheque is genuinely tempting, and I'd be lying if I said otherwise. But once your basic needs are covered, extra income tends to buy a lot less happiness than people expect, especially if you're too worn out to enjoy it. So, weighing it all up, I'd take the second job without much hesitation. It's your decision, of course — but honestly, I think the version of you a year from now will thank you for it.
Why this is CLB 11: the response sounds genuinely native-like and effortless. Vocabulary is precise and sophisticated ('sustainability,' 'compounds,' 'a fatter paycheque'), and the speaker uses natural hedging and nuance ('if you want my honest take,' 'I'd lean pretty firmly,' 'I'm not pretending the money doesn't matter'). Ideas are developed with real depth and a long-term perspective rather than surface points. The rhythm is conversational and confident, with idiomatic touches ('which way to jump,' 'on the table,' 'weighing it all up') woven in seamlessly — yet the recommendation is still unmistakable.
9Common mistakes on Task 1
Most lost points on Task 1 come from a handful of repeatable errors. Knowing them in advance is half the fix.
10How to practise Task 1
Task 1 rewards rehearsal more than almost any other part of CELPIP, because the format never changes. Here is a practice loop that builds the skill fast.
Do not memorise full answers — examiners spot canned scripts instantly, and any prompt that breaks your script leaves you stranded. Memorise the structure and your phrase bank, then improvise the content. That is what makes you sound natural and flexible under pressure.
11How FlexiLingo helps you master CELPIP Speaking
Getting better at Task 1 means doing the loop above many times with honest feedback — which is exactly what FlexiLingo is built for. Here is how it turns scattered practice into steady band gains.
Practise Task 1 and all eight Speaking tasks on authentic, exam-style situations, recorded against the real 30-second prep and 90-second speaking clock so the pacing becomes second nature.
Get immediate, specific feedback on Content/Coherence, Vocabulary, Listenability, and Task Fulfilment — so you know whether your recommendation was clear, your reasons landed, and you filled the time.
Compare your response with model answers at CLB 7, 9, and 11 for the same prompt, so you can hear exactly what separates a passing answer from a top-band one and copy the moves.
Save the high-value words and advice phrases you meet — commute, work-life balance, 'if I were you,' 'at the end of the day' — with the full sentence as context, building a phrase bank you can actually deploy under pressure.
The phrases and vocabulary you save come back for review at the optimal moment, so your advice bank is genuinely memorised and ready when the test clock starts.
Frequently Asked Questions
You get 30 seconds of preparation time after you read and hear the situation, and then 90 seconds to speak. The clock is automated — recording starts and stops on its own, you cannot pause or re-record, and if you are still talking when the 90 seconds ends, it cuts you off mid-sentence. Practise to that exact rhythm so you never run out of time or words.
Choose one. Task 1 is Giving Advice, and advice means a clear recommendation. Saying 'it depends' or 'both are good' reads as dodging the task and hurts both Content and Task Fulfilment. Commit to one option out loud, early — you can still acknowledge the other side, but make your recommendation unmistakable.
This is the most common Task 1 problem, and the fix is in the structure. Develop each reason with a concrete consequence instead of stating it in one line, add a sentence that acknowledges the other option and explains why it still loses, and keep a warm two-sentence closing in reserve. Two fully developed reasons plus a closing comfortably fills 90 seconds. Rehearsing with a real timer trains you to pace it.
No — CELPIP does not penalise accent. Listenability is about how easy you are to follow: clear pronunciation, natural intonation, smooth pacing, and ideas that link logically. A noticeable accent is completely fine. What hurts you is constant hesitation, long pauses, and flat, robotic delivery. Focus on speaking clearly and naturally, not on sounding like a particular nationality.
Keep the same clear structure, then upgrade three things. First, widen your vocabulary — swap 'good/better/more money' for precise terms like work-life balance, commute, manageable, and long-term. Second, develop each reason with a real consequence rather than stating it once. Third, smooth out your delivery with varied connectors ('on top of that,' 'here's the thing,' 'at the end of the day') and a few natural idiomatic phrases. Record yourself, compare against model answers by band, and repeat until the higher-band language feels automatic.
Practise CELPIP Speaking until it's automatic
Use FlexiLingo to practise real CELPIP Speaking tasks against the exam clock, get instant feedback on the four dimensions, and compare your answers with model responses at every band.